Current:Home > reviewsInside the Coal War Games -TradeSphere
Inside the Coal War Games
View
Date:2025-04-14 08:05:51
This story was updated on Oct. 11 with federal regulators’ response to requests to extend the comment period.
In two important policy moves, Scott Pruitt and Rick Perry are both seeking to defend the same fiefdom: coal’s dwindling domain as the ruling fuel for electric utility companies.
They’re on the same crusade, but with rather different strategies. Pruitt, the head of the Environmental Protection Agency, chose a war of attrition, while Perry, the energy secretary, mounted a blitzkreig.
Pruitt’s order on Monday to revoke the Clean Power Plan and its controls on carbon dioxide emissions from the nation’s coal-fired power plants displayed no rush to replace the rule. That would have to wait—it’s not clear how long—for a review of whether any such regulation was even needed, let alone how it would work.
In contrast, Perry’s order last month telling federal regulators to help rescue coal-fired power plants from the crippling competition of natural gas and renewables was framed as such an emergency that an arcane set of new rules ought to be rushed into effect, with only the briefest review and public comment.
Hurry up and wait, as soldiers call this dichotomy. But either way, critics say coal’s last stand is a lost cause.
Coal Can’t Compete
“The problem of climate change isn’t going away, and all they are buying now is some delay,” said David Doniger of the Natural Resources Defense Council. He says the Clean Air Act is here to stay, as is the Supreme Court’s repeated conclusion that the law requires EPA to regulate emissions of dangerous greenhouse gases from power plants and other big sources. Like others, his group plans to sue.
New York’s energy czar, Richard Kauffman, suggested the state would oppose both Perry and Pruitt and press forward with its clean energy goals. Kauffman, who is in the midst of restructuring New York’s grid, said the state should be “building the new grid and not rebuilding the old grid.”
“I don’t think it changes any other market factors that are pushing coal out of the system,” said John Larsen, a director of the Rhodium Group, which studies the power markets.
A new analysis of what lies ahead for coal, issued by the Union of Concerned Scientists, said it will “almost certainly continue” to fade away.
“Utilities are already planning to retire another 13 percent of the nation’s coal generating capacity. An additional 5 percent will either retire or convert to natural gas,” the report said. “Beyond those already slated for retirement or conversion, a further 20 percent of 2016 coal generating capacity is uneconomic compared to existing natural gas. That represents 17 percent of the coal units that were operating at the end of 2016.”
Perry: A Rush to Protect Dirty Energy
That’s exactly what drove Perry to depict the vanishing coal power plants as a kind of national emergency and direct the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, an independent agency but one whose new quorum has just been replenished with Trump appointees, to take urgent action to ensure reliable backup power to the grid.
Perry’s prescription is to ensure that old coal and nuclear plants that can’t always compete in spot wholesale markets with modern, low-cost gas and renewables will be compensated anyway via payments in so-called “capacity” markets, as well as for other services that maintain the grid’s stability. In effect, they’d be paid just for keeping their turbines ready to turn, so long as they kept 90 days worth of coal on hand.
Tellingly, a group representing an array of energy interests—including gas and clean energy groups and some producers and consumers, but not coal or nuclear interests—told FERC that the deadlines set by Perry “are wholly unreasonable and insufficient to allow for an informed consideration of the significant issues.”
“This is one of the most significant proposed rules in decades related to the energy industry and, if finalized, would unquestionably have significant ramifications,” they wrote. “When agencies consider a proposed rule that could affect electricity prices paid by hundreds of millions of consumers and hundreds of thousands of businesses, as well as entire industries and their tens of thousands of workers, such as the proposal in question, it is customary … for an agency to allow time for meaningful comments to be filed in the record so that the agency can make a reasoned decision.”
On Wednesday, the commission refused the groups’ request for more time to file their comments on rules to put Perry’s plan into effect. The comments are due starting on October 23 with two additional weeks for rebuttals. Opponents of the plan handed in more than 10,000 comments from individuals denouncing it.
Pruitt: The Slow War of Attrition
The irony here, of course, is that Pruitt wants to follow that noble principle to a frivolous fault, withdrawing a rule that was developed over several years and with extraordinary review and comment, and spinning it out into an endless future—to “game the system,” as Tim Profeta, director of Duke University’s Nicholas Institute for Environmental Policy Solutions, put it.
Already, the Clean Power Plan had been litigated but left in legal limbo, first by a Supreme Court stay and then by a flummoxed appeals court, which heard oral arguments more than a year ago but has been awaiting the next move from the administration ever since the election.
The long review of next steps that Pruitt is suggesting—known in the bureaucratic jargon as an Advanced Notice of Proposed Rulemaking—“would only delay action,” Profeta said. “It seems clear that there’s no desire to regulate greenhouse gases from power plants any time in the near future.”
veryGood! (2495)
Related
- House passes bill to add 66 new federal judgeships, but prospects murky after Biden veto threat
- Feds fine ship company $2 million for dumping oil and garbage into ocean off U.S. coast
- These 12 Sites With Fast Shipping Are Perfect for Last-Minute Shopping
- Listen to Taylor Swift's Re-Recorded Version of Look What You Made Me Do in Wilderness Teaser
- Man can't find second winning lottery ticket, sues over $394 million jackpot, lawsuit says
- More than 100,000 people have been evacuated over 3 weeks from flooding in Pakistan
- Gunfire in Pittsburgh neighborhood prompts evacuations, standoff; person later pronounced dead
- Virgo Shoppable Horoscope: 11 Gifts Every Virgo Needs to Organize, Unwind & Celebrate
- Trump issues order to ban transgender troops from serving openly in the military
- Why a stranger's hello can do more than just brighten your day
Ranking
- Former longtime South Carolina congressman John Spratt dies at 82
- Russian mercenary boss Yevgeny Prigozhin challenged the Kremlin in a brief mutiny
- 'Star Wars: Ahsoka' has a Jedi with two light sabers but not much else. Yet.
- Giants TE Tommy Sweeney 'stable, alert' after 'scary' medical event at practice
- Global Warming Set the Stage for Los Angeles Fires
- Jailed Sam Bankman-Fried is surviving on bread and water, harming ability to prepare for trial, lawyers say
- US approves new $500M arms sale to Taiwan as aggression from China intensifies
- 'Floodwater up to 3 feet high' Grand Canyon flooding forces evacuations, knocks out power
Recommendation
Senate begins final push to expand Social Security benefits for millions of people
North Carolina woman arrested after allegedly faking her own murder
New Mexico’s Veterans Services boss is stepping down, governor says
Montana woman sentenced to life in prison for torturing and killing her 12-year-old grandson
Scoot flight from Singapore to Wuhan turns back after 'technical issue' detected
How much of Maui has burned in the wildfires? Aerial images show fire damage as containment efforts continue
Man arrested after 1-year-old girl's van death during dangerous heat in Omaha
Man arrested in kidnapping, death of Andrea Vasquez, 19, in Southern California